2. general mcclellan proved to be an incapable leader for the north for two reasons. what were they?
a) he proved incapable of leading an inferior army.
b) he always fought with lincoln over policies.
c) he was overly cautious as battles neared.
d) he always believed he was outnumbered.

C) He was overly cautious as battles neared.

D) He always believed he was outnumbered.

Explanation:

George Brinton McClellan was an American military man and politician, who participated in the early stages of the United States Civil War with the rank of Major General. McClellan had proven himself as an efficient organizer with a strong personal magnetism. For this reason, together with some successes in West Virginia, President Lincoln appointed him Major General in the Union Army, only under General Winfield Scott. He reorganized a disunited and poorly disciplined army, which earned him the respect and approval of his men. Their military operations, however, were only a series of wasted failures and opportunities. McClellan continually overestimated the capacity of his adversary and his plans, excessively cautious, lacked the audacity and decision necessary. After the battle of Antietam, he was dismissed and ordered to hand over command to General Ambrose Burnside and return to New Jersey, his home at that time, to await new orders, which never came.

your mom

now im just trying to get this to 20 characters hope it works hey it works hope it okay bye

answer: (fluidity)is the correct answer.

explanation: because of this characteristic, success on the battlefield depends in large part on the ability to adapt to proactively change events to our advantage as well as to react quickly to constantly changing conditions