Which answer best explains the cherokee's main argument against georgia in cherokee nation v. georgia? (5 points)
the cherokee argued they had legally bought their land from other tribes.
the cherokee argued they were a separate nation and not bound by state laws.
the cherokee argued they had already signed an agreement with the federal government.
the cherokee argued they had given all their land to the missions so georgia had no case. description

The Cherokee argued they were a separate nation and not bound by state laws.

Explanation:

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, it was a case of the Supreme Court of the United States. The Cherokee Nation applied for a federal court order against the laws passed by the State of Georgia of the United States. UU That deprived them of rights within their limits, but the Supreme Court did not hear the case on its merits. It was ruled that he had no original jurisdiction in the matter, since the Cherokees were a dependent nation, with a relationship to the United States as that of a "ward to his guardian," as Judge Marshall said.

meaning the clothes cost alot of money

while it was true that the cotton gin reduced the labor of removing seeds, it did not reduce the need for slaves to grow and pick the cotton.

explanation:

before eli whitney's invention of the cotton gin, picking and cleaning cotton was a slow, labor-intensive job. workers, usually slaves, had to pick the seeds from the cotton fibers by hand. this invention made it possible to grow large amounts of cotton on big farms and make money.