At last he found rebecca, smiling, holding cara-ann in her arms. she was dancing. they were too far away for alex to reach them, and the distance felt irrevocable, a chasm that would keep him from ever again touching the delicate silk of rebecca’s eyelids, or feeling, through his daughter’s ribs, the scramble of her heartbeat. without the zoom, he couldn’t even see them. in desperation, he t’d rebecca, pls wat 4 me, my butiful wyf, then kept his zoom trained on her face until he saw her register the vibration, pause in her dancing, and reach for it.

which of these is the best question to address the societal issue raised in this excerpt?

does technology or hinder meaningful communication?

should proper spelling and grammar be required to send texts?

is it dangerous to text while engaged in other activities?

how will technology affect the music industry of the future?

The correct question to represent the social issue is: Does technology help or hinder meaningful communication?

Explanation:

In the first place, we can observe that Alex is the main male character in this story. In second place we understand that he is far away from his wife and daughter. In third place, we comprehend that he is trying to get close to them. But in fourth place we discover that he has an indirect way of communicating to them because of the distance separating them, thus he tries to reach them out however the lack of clarity in the spelling doesn't let us know what he actually did. So, the problem here is not the effect of technology and music industry, it isn't also texting while doing other activities, because the text doesn't even take that approach. But, the text lights the spelling and grammar in communication. however spelling and grammar are norms of a communication system, therefore the text is about the way technology can help or hinder meaningful communication because if that smartphone had a grammar app to make the user modify his horrifying spelling, he would have delivered his message to them. So even though he had bad spelling and grammar, the text isn't about the way he writes but the ability of technology to help us deliver our message.

He didn't institute a new tax system, he focused on nationalizing the industries.

10 states did

~courtney

explanation:

i think it is in quadrant 4.

the five year plans were part of a command economy. there was little choice in what would be emphasized for the current 5 year period.

the answer to democracy or totalitarianism is a bit harder. in stalin's time, russia was totalitarian. now that's not entirely true. putin has moved towards at least the boundary.