History, 12.12.2019 06:31, ssargeant2559

Which of the following was not an outcome of francisco vázquez de coronado’s expedition?
a. finding small amounts of gold
b. claiming new lands for spain
c. having the expedition viewed as a failure
d. traveling through oklahoma territory

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Im pretty sure the answer is D because that is the only one he did not do and it was asking what was not an outcome and that to me fits it.

answered: freedygotmoney

neither B or D are right, ive taken the test enough times to know that, the correct answer is A.

The expedition was successful in finding new lands throughout the oklahoma territory however the expedition was marked as a failure because no gold was found only amounts of fairly good soil.

answered: Guest

to oppose fdr’s new deal

explanation:

the american liberty league. the american liberty league was a nonpartisan organization formed in 1934 in opposition to the new deal. the organization's stated goal was “to defend the constitution and defend the rights and liberties guaranteed by that constitution.”

answered: Guest

question: write a report analyzing through articles of confederation.

answer: the articles of confederation the united states constitution was written when the people feared strong government the new nation needed some kind of organization to hold states together to them fend off future attacks and make a stronger support system through the states and people the states bonded through a friendship that best served as a defense against a invasion and states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations the strengths were that the congress has the highest power in the nation because of fear of monarchy congress had the sole power to declare war and assign treaties disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress and weaknesses were the lack of power given to congress the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws if a state did not support a federal law that state could simply ignore it congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade.

explanation: so like every argument they have strengths and weaknesses but in this case there were more weaknesses but they managed o get through it and make an agreement

question answered by

(jacemorris04)

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 22.06.2019 01:30, jeniferfayzieva2018

What mountain range is located near 60*n and 60*e

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 01:30, rosaa7

Which answer best describes an advantage of shipping goods by canal? a) most towns would rather have canals then noisy railroads b) goods could travel very fast downstream in the canal system c) traveling by boat is a much more relaxing way to transport goods. d) heavy loads of goods could travel by boat more easily then if pulled by horses.

Answers: 2

continue

History, 22.06.2019 06:30, AdiGirlBrainly

Question 6 of 27 1 point which of the following best describes the three-fifths compromise at the constitutional convention? o a. no more than three-fifths of a state's population could include slaves. o b. three-fifths of a state's slaves had to be released within 20 years. oc. slaves would be counted as three-fifths of a person when determining representation in congress. od. three-fifths of a state's population had to vote for slavery if a territory was to enter the union as a slave state. g

Answers: 2

continue

History, 22.06.2019 06:40, bhale2030

When a county and a city work together to run a school district, they have organized a

Answers: 3

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Which of the following was not an outcome of francisco vázquez de coronado’s expedition?
a. f...