How was john marshall interpretation of the constitution different from thomas jefferson's?

Marshall believed the Constitution granted strong federal powers; Jefferson did not.

Explanation:

John Marshall was adept at federalism and believed that the nation should establish itself around a strong and sovereign central government. For this reason, Marshall interpreted that the constitution allowed the federal government to have a strong power.

On the other hand, Thomas Jefferson was a strong opponent or federalism, he opposed a strong centralized government and defended the rights of states. Jefferson believed that giving strong powers to a central government could influence authoritarianism.

step-by-step explanation:

100%     = 120

1%= 120/100=   1.2

9%   = 1.2 x 9=     10.8

10.80 to the 120 to get $130.80