How was john marshall interpretation of the constitution different from thomas jefferson's?

Marshall believed the Constitution granted strong federal powers; Jefferson did not.

Explanation:

John Marshall was adept at federalism and believed that the nation should establish itself around a strong and sovereign central government. For this reason, Marshall interpreted that the constitution allowed the federal government to have a strong power.

On the other hand, Thomas Jefferson was a strong opponent or federalism, he opposed a strong centralized government and defended the rights of states. Jefferson believed that giving strong powers to a central government could influence authoritarianism.

though africans landed with few possessions, they carried their cultures, skills, and spiritual worldviews into the americas. wherever african religions took root in the new world, africans and their descendants changed and adapted their belief systems to local circumstances and influences. individual circumstances created variations in the way people practiced their faiths, what they believed, and what significance it held for their lives.

explanation:

mark brainliest!

jewish people sniffed up all of the money, thus making it hard for society