In the east african nation of somalia, the lack of a central government authority led to military intervention by the united nations in the 1990s. what consequences might a country face when it deals with a state of anarchy? how can a state of anarchy result in violence and safety risks?

The lack of governmental authority and structure in a government facing a state of anarchy results in a lack of oversight. During the 1990s, Somalia’s central government devolved into warfare between tribal and warlord leaders, resulting in increases in violence and crime.

Anarchy creates violence, low education and health rates and lower expectancy of life.

Explanation:

When there´s a state of anarchy there´s no government to take care of the programs that a State usually takes on, like health, education and security, with no one to make sure law is obbeyed, the rule of the strongests is the law, and a state of uncertainity for foreign invetors and domestic businessmen starts. The low empoyment rates because of that can make the greatest men to turn into the criminal world because there´s no other choice, this would escalate the violence and lower the safety of a country.

no options provided, here,but the answer to this question is often: a historian cites a japanese newspaper article published a year after the end of world war ii in order to draw conclusions about the effect of the war on the japanese economy.

clearly from the answer, the historian alludes to historical sources,and records to aid in analyzing and drawing conclusion on the effect of the war on the economy of japan.

the correct answer would be a. i think tara will practice for her test because she realizes her mistake

hope i .

could i get brainliest.