History
History, 30.09.2019 01:30, jeremiah52

Why did constitutional monarchy develop in england while absolute monarchy continued in russia?

russia was less economically developed than england and relied on a strong monarch to address the nation’s issues.

russian monarchs like peter the great increased the power of the nobility, while english monarchs like elizabeth i refused to consult with the english parliament.

russian monarchs deeply resented the intrusion of religious authorities into affairs of state, while english monarchs believed they owed allegiance to the head of the church.

russia thrived economically under absolute monarchs, while england relied on parliament to rebuild after the english civil war.

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 19:30, TerronRice
How did the united states surprise other delegates at the washington naval conference in 1921?
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 22:30, hii4199
The byzantine empire weakened after asia minor
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 02:30, nghtcll
Cuneiform was invented in which religion? mesoamerica egypt indus mesopotamia
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 03:00, dbn4everloved
He government, which was designed for the people, has got into the hands of bosses and their employers, the special interests. an invisible empire has been set up above the forms of democracy. –woodrow wilson who or what does wilson believe is controlling the us government?
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Why did constitutional monarchy develop in england while absolute monarchy continued in russia?

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Biology, 28.10.2020 22:40
Konu
Mathematics, 28.10.2020 22:40