Which does not explain how renaissance ideas spread beyond italy? a. when italian art patrons fell on hard times, they sold most of their precious artwork to pay their debts. b. merchants and scholars exported classical greek and latin texts printed in venice and contemporary works such as machiavelli's the prince and castiglione's the book of the courtier. c. italian merchants traveled all over europe, carrying with them luxury goods, printed classical greek and latin texts, as well as modern printed works and italian artwork. > > > > > d. when foreign armies invaded italy, they took italian artwork and ideas home.

The correct answer is C) Italian merchants traveled all over Europe, carrying with them luxury goods, printed classical Greek and Latin texts, as well as modern printed works and Italian artwork.

The statement that does not explain how Renaissance ideas spread beyond Italy is "Italian merchants traveled all over Europe, carrying with them luxury goods, printed classical Greek and Latin texts, as well as modern printed works and Italian artwork."

The Italian Renaissance started in the 14th century and represented a total departure from the religious ideas that dominated the Dark Ages in Medieval Europe. The Renaissance started to spread through France and then Germany by different means: through merchants and trade, by the publishing of many works of art, and due to some war conflicts and invasions.

the second significant cause of the great migration was the desire of black southerners to escape segregation, known euphemistically as jim crow. rural african american southerners believed that segregation - and racism and prejudice against blacks - was significantly less intense in the north.

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.