In state court, a losing party can appeal a case if

a jury is unable to make a decision.
a judge disagrees with a jury’s decision.
a precedent does not exist.
a higher court agrees to hear it.

In state court, a losing party can appeal a case if D. a higher court agrees to hear it.

Generally the losing party in a lawsuit may appeal their case to a higher court. The higher court will audits the case for lawful errors. On the off chance that an appeal is without a doubt, the lower court's choice might be switched in entire or to a limited extent. In the event that an appeal is denied, the lower court's choice stands. State and federal appeals courts audit the lower trial courts choices. In the event that a gathering loses in an appeals court, they may engage the state incomparable court or to the United States Supreme Court. Survey of claims in these courts is optional and restricted to a little level of cases.

Judges are usually appointed while elected officials are voted by the people to be in the chosen position.  A judge's main role is to apply or interpret laws while an elected official, say a Senator, creates laws.

Grade:  9

Subject:  history

Chapter:  political party

Keywords: a losing party, higher court, judge, precedent , jury

In a state court, The losing party can appeal is a higher court agrees to hear that case.

Further Explanation:

A higher court of Supreme Court is the biggest court in the country and the decision take by it cannot be overturned or challenged anywhere. But not all the cases are heard or taken by higher courts. There is a procedure to follow that. In simple words, a losing party can’t just challenge the decision of higher court just because they are not happy with the verdict of lower court. They can challenge the court order only if they find any errors in the result such as misinterpretation of any legal precedent or any error in judgment. If the higher court finds any error in judgment of higher court, then it in its all rights can overturn that judgment. In recent times, the number of cases for re-hearing has substantially increased. Nearly about 10000 cases come every year in higher courts for re-evaluation but not every case is accepted by the higher court. If higher court grants the appeal or re-hearing the case then both parties will present their case in front of bench of five judges. It is not mandatory that all 5 judges have to be available at the time of hearing and it is very rare that all the 5 judges sit in the hearing of 1 case.  

Learn more:

1. Which is a result of island-hopping?

2. In the Supreme Court’s decision in korematsu v. United States, the court said that korematsu?

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Subject: Constitution

Chapter: Supreme Court

Keywords:

United States, Lower Court, Higher Court, Re-appeal, Re-evaluation, Case, Judges, Evidence, Court Proceeding, Error of judgment, Misinterpretation.  

pepin the short[a] (german: pippin der kurze, french: pépin le bref, c. 714 – 24 september 768) was the king of the franks from 751 until his death. he was the first of the carolingians to become king.[b][2]

the younger son of the frankish prince charles martel and his wife rotrude, pepin's upbringing was distinguished by the ecclesiastical education he had received from the monks of st. denis. succeeding his father as the mayor of the palace in 741, pepin reigned over francia jointly with his elder brother carloman. pepin ruled in neustria, burgundy, and provence, while his brother carloman established himself in austrasia, alemannia and thuringia. the brothers were active in suppressing revolts led by the bavarians, aquitanians, saxons, and the alemanni in the early years of their reign. in 743, they ended the frankish interregnum by choosing childeric iii, who was to be the last merovingian monarch, as figurehead king of the franks.

china is shifting toward specialization in industry and services and away from agriculture.

explanation:

mark brainliest