People in the colonies had a much different perspective of the events of the boston massacre than people in great britain. which of the following best describes the british interpretation of the event?
a. they thought the people who started the riot should be tried and executed as traitors.
b. they thought the colonists blew the event out of proportion and used it as propaganda.
c. they thought the colonists were justified in being upset and for wanting independence.
d. they thought the soldiers responsible for killing the civilians should be harshly punished.
i'm pretty sure it's any confirmation?

gaius cassius longinus and marcus junius brutus, former enemies of julius caesar who'd joined the roman senate, led caesar's assassination, dubbing themselves "the liberators." and the second one is   the assassination of julius caesar was the result of a conspiracy by many roman senators led by gaius cassius longinus, decimus junius brutus albinus, and marcus junius brutus. they stabbed caesar (23 times) to death in a location adjacent to the theatre of pompey on the ides of march 15 march 44 bc.

- three-quarters or two-thirds..

- "the constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the house of representatives and the senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures."

< 3