History
History, 30.01.2020 13:03, cpcoolestkid4

History/english

read the following:

the consequences of a speedy removal will be important to the united states, to individual states, and to the indians themselves. the pecuniary [financial] advantages which it promises to the government are the least of its recommendations. it puts an end to all possible danger of collision between the authorities of the general and state governments on account of the indians.

how does jackson most clearly make a hasty generalization about indian removal in this excerpt?
a. he has no proof that the american indians and the government will have conflicts.
b. he has no evidence that conflict with american indians will end with their removal.
c. he has no confirmation that the states want the american indians to settle elsewhere.
d. he has no way of knowing whether the american indians want to move from their lands.

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 22.06.2019 04:00, mari5512
What does law number eight of hammurabi’s code describe the punishment for
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 06:30, kimberlylove387
No mercy for the user europa2433 because he or she reports everyone. and its annoying. come on who agrees.
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 13:30, miklff
During world war ll japanese-americans were
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 14:20, ayoismeisjjjjuan
Which of the following philosophers would most likely support taxing income to redistribute wealth to the poor
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
History/english

read the following:

the consequences of a speedy removal w...

Questions in other subjects: