Two advancements that wealth brought to ancient egypt

The construction of Pyramids and the fabrication of Papyrus.

Explanation: Two advances that wealth brought to ancient Egypt were:

1. The construction of portentous pyramids that still persist over time. Although in other civilizations buildings were built that are now ruins, in the case of the pyramids it is the opposite. Undoubtedly, a contribution to Architecture and a notable advance of the wealth of that ancient civilization.

2. The use of Papyrus, a system very similar to that of paper, but which not only had use for writing matters, but also with it carpets, dresses, sandals were made among other items used by the Egyptians in ancient times.

d.prevent the spread of communism outside of eastern europe.

the articles of confederation only set up the continental congress at the federal level. there were no executive or judicial branches except within the states. the states were allowed to keep every right that was not specifically given to congress. the bonding of the states was through a 'firm league of friendship' that best served as a defense agreement against invasion. states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations.

not many historians today talk about the strengths of the articles of confederation, likely because of how unpopular the document quickly became. the articles did set the legislative body, congress, as the highest power in the nation because of the fear of monarchy. congress had the sole power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress. the document also stipulated that canada was allowed to enter the union if they desired.

there were more weaknesses than strengths under the articles of confederation. the lack of power given to the continental congress strangled the federal government. the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. if a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. amending the articles of confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.