Write a critique of the two speeches given at the Berlin Wall by President Kennedy and President Reagan on which speech was more effective. You should address your critique to future world leaders. You will notice that although both speeches hope to change the thinking of the Eastern Bloc, each had a different approach. Within your critique, you need to propose the speeches, as well as with facts. Your concluding statement should ask future leaders to include the techniques you found most favorable. Focus on the following questions to help you prepare your essay. • What was Kennedy’s approach?
• What was Reagan’s approach?
• How are the speeches similar?
• How are they different?
• Which speech do you think was most effective? Why?
• Why would other listeners disagree?

the answer is c.richard m. nixon

popular sovereignty   influenced the declaration of independence because the colonists wanted to have freedom to do they wanted so they put into writing

1. the group that formally abolished the monarchy was the roundheads. after the monarchy was abolished, the english commonwealth was created. it was led by oliver cromwell, who later took the title lord protector. this leader was a puritan, meaning that he supported removing catholic rituals from the church of england.

2. identify a central idea in the bill of rights.

a.   the monarch could only exercise power as stated in the law.

3. ascended the english throne as   a joint monarch after accepting   the bill of rights   mary ii

appointed catholics as government   officials and recruited them in the   army

james ii

conquered ireland and established   the commonwealth

oliver cromwell

lost a long, bloody civil war against   forces loyal to parliament

charles i

was crowned king after a period   of commonwealth rule in england

charles ii

4. identify two effects of the glorious revolution on the english monarchy.

the idea of monarchs ruling by divine right was rejected.

a limited, constitutional monarchy was established.

5. what are two ways the bill of rights opposes the idea of the divine right of kings?

it stated that the monarch's power was subject to limits set by parliament.

it abolished the role of the monarch as the head of the church of england.

they change the constitution.