History
History, 13.04.2021 04:40, bunbun2913

Which of the following statements accurately summarizes the reasoning for the decision in Baker v. Carr (1962) ? * 2 points Because rural districts had fewer people, representation was unevenly distributed; thus, Baker was denied equal protection under the law. To ensure equal protection under the law, there should be an equal number of rural and urban districts in a state. There should be redistricting every ten years at the federal level, but the state can choose not to redistrict at the state and local levels. Congressional redistricting must involve traditionally excluded groups in the process or it violates the equal protection clause.

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 15:30, pam93
The tobacco industry was developed by of north carolina.
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 21:10, mikaydeannf1351
Interest groups are protected by the first amendment guarantees of petition. and what other freedom?
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 01:30, idk1561
3. according to oliver, how can the fast food industry with the food revolution? i will give brainliest
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 05:00, lorie76
Were the common crimes brought before the suffolk county court? what were the common sentences for convictions what? why type of punishment did the court prefer to inflict?
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Which of the following statements accurately summarizes the reasoning for the decision in Baker v. C...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 11.03.2022 02:20