History
History, 13.04.2021 04:00, rachel63892

Phyllis schlafly’s views are most likely shared with members of which group

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 19:30, zoeycrew
In the decision for dred scott vs. sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 01:00, byrdkellykellybyrd
Who founded the social contract theory of the government
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 02:00, escuderojohny
How could a works-cited list a reader determine whether to believe the claims you make in an essay? a. by synthesizing your conclusions into a simple objective summary o b. by proving that your claims are supported with credible evidence ) c. by allowing you to make claims without quoting other writers o d. by providing a clear organizational structure to your essay
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 08:30, china236
When the novel made its first appearance in the 1700s, why did it appeal to people of all classes? people could identify with the stories of everyday life. people were entertained by reading about the lives of nobles. people preferred stories that were thoughtful, not full of action. people were excited to read about great historical figures.
Answers: 3
Do you know the correct answer?
Phyllis schlafly’s views are most likely shared with members of which group...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 18.09.2020 21:01
Konu
Mathematics, 18.09.2020 21:01
Konu
English, 18.09.2020 21:01
Konu
Social Studies, 18.09.2020 21:01
Konu
English, 18.09.2020 21:01
Konu
Biology, 18.09.2020 21:01
Konu
English, 18.09.2020 21:01
Konu
English, 18.09.2020 21:01
Konu
Mathematics, 18.09.2020 21:01
Konu
Mathematics, 18.09.2020 21:01