History, 08.04.2021 19:50, addiemaygulley2835

In Gideon vs. Wainright (1963), the Supreme Court was asked to decide if a state court has to supply a lawyer to someone who can not afford one. How did the court rule? * The Court said that the state must provide a lawyer if you are too poor to afford one
The Court said that the state does not need to provide a lawyer no matter if the person is poor or not.
The Court said that the state should pay one-half of the lawyer's cost

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 16:30, DIABLO3580

What directive in source a might have been at the root of the action described in source b?

Answers: 2

continue

History, 22.06.2019 00:50, louistwdg

This paragraph has a sentence that does not belong. to find it, read the topic sentence again. which sentence is not about george washington? draw a line through that sentence.

Answers: 2

continue

History, 22.06.2019 02:00, rsimmons696

Whose plan centered on keeping the federal budget balanced, instituting tax cuts, and developing public works projects?

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 03:00, angela563

What characteristics did the kiowa share with the other plains people? a) they migrated from the same places b) they were nomadic hunters c) they used the horse extensively d) they spoke the common language! and you

Answers: 1

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

In Gideon vs. Wainright (1963), the Supreme Court was asked to decide if a state court has to supply...