Do you think Japan's decision to attack Pearl Harbor was justified? Explain your answer below.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

I think Japan's decision to attack Pearl Harbor was justified from the perspective of the Japanese Army according to the circumstances of that moment during World War II.

The Japanese wanted retribution for the recent oil embargo decision of the United States. In August 1941, the US federal government imposed an oil embargo as a punishment for the Japanese invasion and presence over different regions of Asia.

Japanese officials considered that an unexpected attack over the navy base of Pearl Harbor, in Hawaii would severely diminish the navy vessels on the United States in the Pacific, opening the way for a powerful Japanese presence in the area.

in february 1787, congress decided that a convention should be convened to revise the articles of confederation, the nation’s first constitution. in may, 55 delegates came to philadelphia, and the constitutional convention began. debates erupted over representation in congress, over slavery, and over the new executive branch. the debates continued through four hot and muggy months. but eventually the delegates reached compromises, and on september 17, they produced the u.s. constitution, replacing the articles with the governing document that has functioned effectively for more than 200 years.

worldwide, 780 million people do not have access to an improved water source. an estimated 2.5 billion people lack access to improved sanitation (more than 35% of the world's population)