Counsel in a trial are arguing that a DNA analysis isn’t proof that a particular person was at the scene of a crime. As a DNA analyst, you’ve identified a point that clearly matches the DNA sample and the suspects DNA. What should your response as an expert witness be? A.
Agree with the lawyer that one matching point is likely to be a coincidence

B.
Argue that the DNA, combined with other testimony, makes the suspect likely to have been there

C.
Argue that even one point of similarity in a DNA profile means the chances of a mistake are one in a billion

D.
Argue that the suspect is clearly guilty, and the DNA analysis is irrelevant

B.  Argue that the DNA, combined with other testimony, makes the suspect likely to have been there

Explanation:

If the subject's DNA was at a crime scene, they are likely to have been there. However, this doesn't automatically mean they are guilty; they could have just been a bystander. You also have to take into account where the DNA sample was found and other testimonies.

he supported the seperation of church and state. he also promoted religious tolerance.

music always has an important role in culture and societies, infact for example rock’n roll music has conditioned different areas of pop culture above all in the 60s. in the modern american society its role is different.

unfortunately many think about how some unfortunate events happened to the columbine high school shootings can be related to rock music just because the teenagers involved listened to this kind of music.

i think that we can valorize the change to take refuge in this genre of music to keep on in everyday life, teenagers are comfortable when they can listen to a song about a specific problem. realizing that someone else is living your personal drama too can them to feel less lonely nowadays.