What was the "Lost Cause" and how did it explain secession? USE EVIDENCE and CITE YOUR SOURCES

Rubric:

1) Topic sentence that re-states the prompt. (1pt)

2) TWO pieces of evidence to support your claims. (2pts)

3) Explanation sentences for how your evidence supports your claims- you should have one explanation sentence for each piece of evidence. (2pts)

3) In-text citations. (1pt)

I will provide an example sentence stem for you to use as your topic sentence (if you would like to, please feel free to use your own)

EX: The Lost Cause argument was it explained the cause of secession as. You should then include two pieces of evidence and then two explanation sentences after your topic sentence.

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

china has confucianism thats everywhere in asia but it isn't really a religion.