Pagsunud-sunurin ang mga sumusunod na pangyayari sa Florante at Laura mula kabanata 1 hanggang 14. Ilagay lamang ang letrang A na tumutukoy na pinakaunang
natalakay at J na pinakahuling natalakay.
1. Nagkuwento si Florante ng kanyang buhay kay Aladin
2. Sa isang madilim at mapanglaw na gubat ay nakatali si Florante at naghihimutok sa
pagkawala ng lahat ng mahahalaga sa kanya.
3. Ikinuwento ni Florante na siya ay muntik nang masaktan ng dalawang ibon noong siya
ay sanggol palamang.
4. Narinig ni Aladin ang mga himutok ni Florante habang siya ay naglalakad sa gubat.
5. Inalala ni Florante si Laura at inakalang pinagtaksilan na siya.
6. Si Florante at pinapasok sa Atenas upang mag-aral at dito rin niya nakilala si Adolfo
7. Iniligtas ni Aladin si Florante mula sa mga leon.
8. Inalala ni Florante ang kanyang ama na ipinapatay ni Konde Adolfo.
9. Inalagaan ni Aladin si Florante hanggang gumaling
10. Nagulat si Florante noong makitang isang Persiyano ang nagligtas sa kanya.​

i believe the correct answer is option b. most eastern european nations joined nato.

though i could be wrong, option d. the eastern european nations were granted complete independence, would be another choice.

hope this ! : )

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

“i think it is very plausible that if there are five votes to end the death penalty, it could be with the people who are on the court right now,” - smith

so basically it is not clearly and consistently imposed

cjokvxdtjvv