What is the downside of ignoring counter storytelling when studying history? A. Ignoring counter storytelling in history can result in an inaccurate portrayal of historical events.
B. Ignoring counter storytelling can lead to telling an incomplete narrative where some experiences are
erased.
C. Both A and B
D. Neither A nor B

i think the answer would happen to be the letter b

because the bar never runs out

couples always argue

the reform movements that arose during the antebellum period in america focused on specific issues: temperance, abolishing imprisonment for debt, pacifism, antislavery, abolishing capital punishment, amelioration of prison conditions (with prison's purpose reconceived as rehabilitation rather than punishment), the humane treatment of animals, the humane and just treatment of native americans, the establishment of public institutions for the care of the destitute, orphans, blind, and mentally ill, the establishment of public schools, the abolition of tobacco use, vegetarianism, health reform, homeopathic medicine, woman's rights (including, at first, especially the establishment of a woman's right to own property apart from her husband and her right to sue for divorce), and the amelioration of labor conditions (including higher pay, the right to form unions, the right to strike, and the demand for limits on the number of work hours, and safe working conditions).

explanation:

which

like dude you only explained

the problem not the