History, 23.03.2021 06:00, dondre54

¿Cómo aprendemos la realidad para el objetivismo?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

El objetivismo es una filosofía diseñada por Ayn Rand, un escritor ruso-estadounidense. El nombre deriva de la idea de que el conocimiento y los valores humanos son objetivos. Estas ideologías se expresaron por primera vez en las obras de ficción de Rand, The Fountainhead y Atlas Shrugged.

El objetivismo es una filosofía multifacética. Básicamente, la premisa gira en torno a "cuidarse a sí mismo". Sostiene que si se hace correctamente y todos lo practican, el mundo entero podría ser un lugar mejor. El objetivismo respalda varios ideales diferentes. Lo esencial son: realidad, razón, interés propio y capitalismo.

Has escuchado la expresión "mente sobre materia" antes. Básicamente, si piensas de manera positiva, las cosas positivas vendrán en tu camino, al menos es más probable que lo hagan, de todos modos. Rand afirma que, "Ninguna cantidad de deseo apasionado, anhelo desesperado o súplica esperanzada puede alterar los hechos ... La realidad no se puede reescribir o escapar, sino, solemne y orgullosamente, enfrentar". Esta teoría rechaza los poderes sobrenaturales o místicos, incluida la existencia de Dios. El objetivismo atribuye todos los sucesos de la vida a la realidad, y eso no es algo que se pueda cambiar, solo soportar.

Las teorías de Rand sobre la razón se entrelazan con el intelecto. El objetivismo requiere que las personas "activen" sus mentes, comprendan todos los hechos de la situación actual y realicen los "siguientes pasos" requeridos. Rand sostiene: "Seguir la razón es rechazar las emociones, la fe o cualquier forma de autoritarismo como guías en la vida". Considera que la emoción es inestable. Rand profesa que, solo porque bloqueemos algo de nuestra mente, no lo hace desaparecer. Esto es simplemente un escape de la responsabilidad. Más bien, debemos afrontar lo que es con fuerza y dignidad.

answered: Guest

d.summerains, the last one

answered: Guest

option d is correct. corroborated sources of historical evidence is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history.

historians tend to use written sources, but audio and visual materials as well as artifacts are important objects that supply information to modern historians.

historical sources are usually divided into two categories: primary and secondary sources. depending on the historian's intent, some sources shift their designation. determining what type of sources toimplement, and the level of credibility and reliability of those sources, is a significant step in critical thinking for the historian.

explanation:

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 17:40, snikergrace

This essay was published in 1788 in response to an article that argued against the ratification of the u. s. constitution. he tells you that the president will have more power than many in princes in according to the essay, what is the effect of dividing control of the military power of the united states between congress and the president?

Answers: 1

continue

History, 21.06.2019 17:50, Derrionna

Ahistorian is writing a book about british prime minister winston churchill. she claims that churchill was one of the earliest british leaders to realize that nazi germany was a serious threat to british security what is the best way to determine whether the historian's interpretation is valid? o a. review primary sources to see if churchill ever recorded his opinions of nazi germany. o b. find out whether the historian has written any other books about british leaders. c. analyze secondary sources summarizing the effects of nazi germany on great britain. o d. cite the historian's book in another study about important 20th- century world leaders.

Answers: 2

continue

History, 22.06.2019 01:00, husamramadan83

Why did stalin want control of eastern europe after ww2?

Answers: 2

continue

History, 22.06.2019 01:30, culbertchristi4887

Will give brainliest and a will put up a free point questionthe following question refers to a hypothetical situation. the 2010 supreme court case, wagner v. tritch, involves the illegal distribution of copyrighted material to foreign consumers via the internet, which is a new area of law. the 9-0, unanimous vote on the court is set to overturn the lower appellate court decision that augustus tritch was liable for millions of dollars to the plaintiff, frederick von wagner, for illegally distributing his book to overseas customers. now that the court has voted on the case, explain what must happen next? describe the different types of opinions that could come from the court.