Which of the following was a reason Stokely Carmichael gave when discussing why non-violence was ineffective

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.

hilary clinton

explanation:

trump won the popular vote and ended up becoming the president in 2016 because of this and the electoral college.

immigrants from northern and western europe continued coming as they had for three centuries, but in decreasing numbers

is this like a kind of true or false question?