I believe the answer is: a.)The right of privacy and speech causing emotional distress came into conflict with the freedom of speech
In that case, the court ruled out that a certain speech cannot be considered as a liability even if it cause discomfort or emotional distress. The line is drawn if the speech somehow directly advocate for violence or a certain harm to happen toward other citizens.
everything about this just does not make sense. what is the question?
because mexico wanted to choose a centralized location