Based on the miranda warning that is evolved from the supreme court case miranda v. arizona, what rights is a person entitled to when she is arrested? give examples of what must happen when a person is accused of a crime and why these rights are necessary

The Miranda warning used by law enforcement lists several different things that citizens are entitled to including:

1) The right to remain silent- Individuals are warned that anything they say can be used against them in a court of law.

2) Right to an attorney- Individuals can have legal counsel with them throughout the process.

Individuals who are being arrested for a crime are made aware of these rights. This warning allows individuals to understand what the procedures are after the arrest and what rights they have throughout the process. These rights are used as a means to ensure that the suspect understands what is happening and it prevents law enforcement officials from violating a citizens rights.

The Miranda warning gives an accused person these rights:

The right to remain silent and not answer questions, knowing that anything said could be used as evidence against you.

The right to be represented by an attorney, who can be present during any questioning by police and defend you in court.

The right to have an attorney appointed for you if you cannot afford to hire an attorney on your own.

If you've ever watched a television crime drama, you've heard the "Miranda warning" -- or at least the beginning of it:  "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney "  There's a couple more sentences to the warning, but TV shows often cut to the next scene before hearing the arresting officer finish their recitation of the full warning.

Miranda v. Arizona was a Supreme Court case decided in 1966.  Ernesto Miranda was accused of kidnapping and raping a woman.  He confessed to the crime when interrogated by police, but attorneys argued that he did not fully understand his 6th Amendment rights.  After the decision in Miranda v. Arizona, it has become standard procedure in all arrests that the arresting officers must clearly state the accused person's rights -- their "Miranda rights," as they have become known.

the bar kochba rebellion (132-135) against the roman empire, also known as the second jewish-roman war, was the second major jewish revolt in judea and the last of the great jewish-roman wars.

after the first jewish-roman war of the years 66-73, the roman authorities took measures to crush any new attempt of rebellion in judea. his political situation was modified and instead of a prefect a governor of praetorian rank was appointed, and in the ruins of jerusalem the seat of a complete roman legion, the legio x fretensis was established.

the political and religious direction of the jewish people was left in the hands of the sanhedrin, with initial headquarters in yavne.

the direct causes of the rebellion vary according to the source. the roman historian dio cassius (155-229) attributes the revolt to the decision of hadrian to found in the place of jerusalem a roman city called aelia capitolina (aelia by its own name and capitolina in honor of the roman god jupiter). on the other hand, the jewish sources, while recognizing this resolution as true, assign higher priority to the decrees dictated by hadrian that forbade the brit milah (circumcision), the respect of the sabbath and the laws of purity in the family.

hadrian's intention was to "civilize" and incorporate the jews once and for all into the greco-roman culture. for greek and roman culture, circumcision was an intolerable mutilation.

the jewish tradition tells in the midrash tanjuma a meeting between rabbi akiva and the governor turnus rufus, where he asked for an explanation about the circumcision.

an additional legion, the legio vi ferrata, moved to the province to maintain order, and work began in the year 131 after the governor of judea, turnus rufus performed the founding ceremony of aelia capitolina. a roman coin with the inscription aelia capitolina was struck in the year 132.

the tannaim rabbi akiva, who without being named nasi directed the sanhedrin, convinced the other members to support the imminent rebellion.

the jewish leaders carefully planned the second rebellion to avoid the numerous errors that had been committed in the first one. in the year 132 the rebellion led by bar kochba quickly expanded from modiim throughout the country, defeating the x roman legion based in jerusalem and destroying the xxii roman legion that had come from egypt.

after defeating german forces in north africa allied leaders turned their attention to "italy," since this was the location that made the most geographic sense before invading northern europe via france.