History, 07.03.2021 08:40, mangustaylor

Main features of non courption movements ??
I will mark as brainlist

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Anti-corruption (anticorruption) comprise activities that oppose or inhibit corruption. Just as corruption takes many forms, anti-corruption efforts vary in scope and in strategy. A general distinction between preventive and reactive measures is sometimes drawn. In such framework, investigative authorities and their attempts to unveil corrupt practices would be considered reactive, while education on the negative impact of corruption, or firm-internal compliance programs are classified as the former.

al organizations (e.g. Transparency International) and inter-governmental organizations and initiatives (e.g. the OECD Working group on bribery) were founded to overcome corruption.[11]

Since the 2000s, the discourse became broader in scope. It became more common to refer to corruption as a violation of human rights, which was also discussed by the responsible international bodies.[12] Besides attempting to find a fitting description for corruption, the integration of corruption into a human rights-framework was also motivated by underlining the importance of corruption and educating people on its costs.[13]

Legal framework

In national and in international legislation, there are laws interpreted as directed against corruption. The laws can stem from resolutions of international organizations, which are implemented by the national governments, who are ratifying those resolutions or be directly issued by the respective national legislative.

Laws against corruption are motivated by similar reasons that are generally motivating the existence of criminal law, as those laws are thought to, on the one hand, bring justice by holding individuals accountable for their wrongdoing, justice can be achieved by sanctioning those corrupted individuals, and potential criminals are deterred by having the consequences of their potential actions demonstrated to them.[14]

International law

Approaching the fight against corruption in an international setting is often seen as preferential over addressing it exclusively in the context of the nation state. The reasons for such preference are multidimensional, ranging from the necessary international cooperation for tracing international corruption scandals,[15] to the binding nature of international treaties, and the loss in relative competitiveness by outlawing an activity that remains legal in other countries.

OECD

Main article: OECD Anti-Bribery Convention

The OECD Anti-Bribery Convention was the first large scale convention targeting an aspect of corruption, when it came in 1999 into force. Ratifying the convention obliges governments to implement it, which is monitored by the OECD Working Group on Bribery. The convention states that it shall be illegal bribing foreign public officials. The convention is currently signed by 43 countries. The scope of the Convention is very limited, as it is only concerned with active bribing. It is hence more reduced than other treaties on restricting corruption, to increase – as the working group's chairman Mark Pieth explained – the influence on its specific target.[16] Empirical research by Nathan Jensen and Edmund Malesky suggests that companies based in countries that ratified the convention, are less likely to pay bribes abroad.[17] The results are not exclusively explainable by the regulatory mechanisms and potential sanctions triggered through this process but are equally influenced by less formal mechanisms, e.g. the peer reviews by officials from other signatories and the potentially resulting influences on the respective country's image.[18] Groups like TI, however, also questioned whether the results of the process are sufficient, especially as a significant number of countries is not actively prosecuting cases of bribery.

answered: chloeneedshelp2008

Explanation:

The movement was essentially a peaceful and non-violent protest against the British government in India.Indians were asked to relinquish their titles and resign from nominated seats in the local bodies as a mark of protest.People were asked to resign from their government jobs.People were asked to withdraw their children from government-controlled or aided schools and colleges.People were asked to boycott foreign goods and use only Indian-made goods.People were asked to boycott the elections to the legislative councils.People were asked not to serve in the British army.It was also planned that if the above steps did not bring results, people would refuse to pay their taxes.The INC also demanded Swarajya or self-government.Only completely non-violent means would be employed to get the demands fulfilled.The non-cooperation movement was a decisive step in the independence movement because, for the first time, the INC was ready to forego constitutional means to achieve self-rule.Gandhiji had assured that Swaraj would be achieved in a year if this movement was continued to completion.

Hope this will help you..

answered: Guest

answer: what events

explanation:

you dont have any choices

answered: Guest

the correct answer is "cut spending on social programs."good luck

explanation: