How is the author of the CON article MOST LIKELY to respond to this statement? A. It is not ironic at all because enumeration is clearly exempted from interpretation by the language of the 1950 census change.
B. It is equally ironic that this author defines a living constitution as one that adapts to new circumstances over time.
C. It is not ironic at all because most people no longer believe in a working interpretation of a living Constitution
D. It is equally ironic that many conservatives are willing to change the founders original intent of a simple headcount.

"a government in which power is divided between state and national levels". federalism is a system of government in which entities such and state and province, share power with the national government.

i'd rather watch halloween but ok

the system of checks and balances is very important to the us constitution. it makes sure that all three branches of government have limited power. that they do not have too much power. with this system they can limit the amount of power that each one has. that way no branch becomes too powerful.

an example of this is how the executive branch can veto bills from the legislative branch but the legislative branch can still override that veto. the name checks and balances come from the power for one branch to check the   power of another branch to make sure that everything is balanced between all three.

i hope this