History
History, 02.03.2021 01:00, AdoNice

Which of the following describes a major contradiction between the us governments stated aims and actual policies during world war 1? a) the government insisted that the war effort would involve both genders but then refused to allow women to serve in the military

b) the government claimed to be fighting to support worldwide democracy but then passed laws severely limiting free speech

c) the government insisted that it would not claim any new territory during the war but then annexed large portions of the ottoman empire

d) the government claimed that it was opposed to communism but then allied itself with the communist leaders of the soviet union

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 18:00, elisakate8362
This emblem shows a jewish star inside a shape that combines a fortress and a shield.
Answers: 2
image
History, 21.06.2019 19:30, zoeycrew
In the decision for dred scott vs. sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 00:00, rwlockwood1
All of the following cities are located in china except
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 04:30, freeman36
Part a: which statement identifies the central idea of the text? a: the north was more powerful than the south and was always going to be the victor of the civil war. b: despite the obvious strength of the north, the outcome of the war was unpredictable at the time. c: the united states underestimated the strength of the south, giving it the upper hand. answer !
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Which of the following describes a major contradiction between the us governments stated aims and ac...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
History, 21.04.2020 20:50