WAS THE BOSTON TEA PARTY MORALLY JUSTIFIED? 1) Was the destruction of private property worth millions of dollars a valid
act of protest?
YES / NO
2) If you answered yes, set forth 3 reasons to justify the destruction of
property. If you answered no, set forth 3 reasons why the destruction
of the tea was not morally justified. please help pleaseee

1. Yes

Explanation: British were bad to the Colonists, the British took over the homes of the colonists. And the British wanted to fight and take over the country they found.

the main inference that can be drawn from jean jacques rousseau's book the social contract is: a. people can enjoy civil and physical freedom, even if it sometimes harms society.

one of the major compromises in the constitutional convention was between the small states and big states. the small states wanted each state to have the same number of representatives in congress. the big states wanted representation based on population.