Question 1: Napoleon Bonaparte claimed to have put into practice the ideals of the French Revolution and the Enlightenment. Do you think he did? Did his actions and the legacy of his reign represent those ideals? Write a paragraph in which you state whether or not Bonaparte's reign and legacy embodied the ideals of the French Revolution and the Enlightenment. Provide facts to support your claim.) Question 2: There were similarities and differences between the American and French revolutions. Write a paragraph that compares and contrasts these two revolutions. Describe both how they were alike and how they were different.) Need To Answer Both Questions To Leave A Response. Will Mark Brainliest to whomever can actually help). Please Please Only Answer The Questions If You Know What To Write Down.​

Question 1: Actually, he did not.  If he did export and spread the ideals of the Revolution, why did he appoint his brothers and other people to high points in government?  Apart from that, they held the position of kings and monarchs which is opposite to the ideals of the Revolution.  It should be that the people have the right to decide for themselves but they didn’t.  Instead, they lived in fear and rebelled against him.

Question 2: Both revolutions started rather moderately, with people demanding more representation in government. Neither gained the full support of everyone in the respective nations either, as evidenced by Loyalists in the US and counterrevolutions in areas like the Vendee in France. In France, the revolution became more radical and ideological, taking Enlightenment ideals and rationalism to the extreme. The revolution in France also led to the dictatorship of Napoleon and the restoration is Bourbon monarchs, so ultimately a return to the status quo, while the American Revolution was successful in gaining American independence. Furthermore, the French Revolution was fought in France while the American Revolution was fought in the colonies of England and never sought to completely depose George III, just remove his control of the colonies.

the supreme court ruled 5-4 that section 4 of the voting rights act of 1965 was unconstitutional. the supreme court found section 4 unconstitutional because of the age of the coverage formulas. the supreme court's opinion notes: "voting discrimination still exists; no one doubts that.jul 7, 2014

is the answer buudy

c holding free elections