History
History, 25.02.2021 23:10, LindseyN1

Please help me??? The conventional explanation is that Herbert Hoover, President when Wall Street collapsed and during the period when the crisis turned into the Great Depression, was a laissez-faire ideologue who refused to use public money and government power to refloat the economy. As soon as FOR succeeded him, in 1933, and having no such inhibitions about government intervention started to apply state planning, the clouds lifted and the nations got back to work. There is no truth in this mythology, though there were indeed profound differences of the character between the two men. Neither understood the nature of the Depression, or how to cure it. It is likely that the efforts of both merely served to prolong the crisis.
-Paul Johnson A History of the American People

When the New Deal was over, capitalism remained intact. The rich still controlled the nation's wealth, as well as its laws, courts, police, newspapers, churches, and colleges. Enough help had been given to enough people to make Roosevelt a hero to millions, but the same system that had brought depression and crisis-the system of waste, of inequality of concern for profit over human need-remained.
-Howard Zinn A Peoples History of the United States

FDR knew nothing about how wealth was created. the legislation he called for was a patchwork of absurdities, sometimes at odds with each other, and sometimes even at odds with themselves. What finally brought the Depression to an end was noether economic legislation nor WWII. Instead, it was the return to normal conditions following the war and the removal of the uncertainty that had haunted business during the FDR years. Prosperity would have returned much sooner had it not been for the destructive and foolish policies of Hoover and Roosevelt.
-Thomas Woods The Politically Incorrect Guide to American Hostory

1. Johnson is a conservative historian, Zinn is a very liberal historian, and Woods is a libertarian history; what about the depression and the new deal do these three very different historians agree?
2. How do these three quotes go against the conventional wisdom of what ended the Great Depression?
3. According to Woods, what ended the Great Depression?
4. According to Zinn, what didnt the Mew Deal change?​

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 13:50, ericgalo808
Aprimary source can be a picture of you that someone else took? true or false
Answers: 2
image
History, 21.06.2019 23:00, superpuglover5924
By june 1943, the allies had regained control of north america. what was the advantage of controlling this region? what would you describe the axis's situation in europe in 1942? how might the axis have benefited by gaining control of great britain by 1942? the last questions of my quiz 10 points more than normal answer it honestly so i can get a good grade < 3
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 00:00, carsonngibbons4354
Which purposes of the constitution are found in the preamble? select the six correct answers. to provide for the common defense to form a more perfect union to promote the general welfare to secure the blessings of liberty to declare independence from britain to establish justice to ensure domestic tranquility
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 01:00, liljobe8973
Which of the following arguments decided the debate over using the atomic bomb against japan in 1945? using the bomb would destroy the armaments still available to japanese forces in japan. using the bomb would demonstrate the power of the united states to the entire world. using the bomb would shorten the war and avoid heavy casualties among invading troops. using the bomb would enable allied forces to invade and take over the japanese mainland
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Please help me??? The conventional explanation is that Herbert Hoover, President when Wall Street c...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 13.03.2020 22:12
Konu
Mathematics, 13.03.2020 22:12
Konu
Mathematics, 13.03.2020 22:12