Write a short paragraph that explains the central idea of the article. Use at least two details from the article to support your response. https://newsela. com/read/lib-nyt-legacy-suffrage/id /2001012165?collection_id=200000019 2&search_id=2aa97bca-b9ea-45e7- 84d4-55444d4f0c55

Speech template this template will you write a speech about ratifying the constitution. remember to include lines that explain checks and balances, as well as the viewpoints of the federalists and anti-federalists. speech title: balancing power in the constitution your name: reviewer (parent or guardian): date: first paragraph: hook your audience into wanting to read or hear your speech. you could tell a story or use a quote. introduce the event and basic facts like people and places. use at least three to five sentences. second paragraph: discuss the systems of separation of powers and checks and balances. use facts to explain the difference between them. third paragraph: discuss the position of the federalists on ratifying the constitution. use facts. fourth paragraph: discuss the position of the anti-federalists on ratifying the constitution. use facts. fifth paragraph: this is where you summarize and review what you wrote. reviewer suggestions: in your speech, be sure to include the following items: description of separation of powers and checks and balances viewpoint of federalists on ratifying the constitution viewpoint of anti-federalists on ratifying the constitution

Look at the map of cities in the united states at the turn of the twentish century what impact did railroads have on cities across the united states at the turn of the twentish century

Hich explains why the constitution gave congress the power to create a system of federal courts? the constitution wanted congress to share power with the judicial branch. the constitution anticipated the need for courts lower than the supreme court. the constitution wanted congress to share power with the appellate courts. the constitution anticipated the need for courts equal to the supreme court.