10. What was the main argument used by Anti-Federalists in debates over ratification of the U. S. Constitution? A. Individual rights would be threatened by the creation of a stronger federal government.

B. Separating the powers of the federal government into three branches would lead to confusion and chaos.

C. The state governments would still exercise too much power over the national government

under the new Constitution.

D. It was unclear whether the Supreme Court or the individual states had the power to

declare federal laws unconstitutional

A. Individual rights would be threatened by the creation of a stronger federal government.

Explanation:

The main argument used by Anti-Federalists in debates over ratification of the U.S. Constitution is that "Individual rights would be threatened by the creation of a stronger federal government."

This is evident as they eventually asked for the establishment of a Bill of Rights to serves as a means of protecting the Individual and states rights that may be threatened by the creation of a stronger federal government.

its main object was the establishment of "settlement houses" in poor urban areas, in which volunteer middle-class "settlement workers" would live, hoping to share knowledge and culture with, and alleviate the poverty of, their low-income neighbors.

i am not 100% positive but i think it is is b. both are non-partisan jobs

i am pretty sure that members of congress have term limits, can be impeached, and are nominated through direct popular vote.