2. Colonization and Encomiendas had many positive effects for the mother country such as easy access to cheap resources and cheap labor. However, colonization and encomiendas had an
extremely negative effect on the areas that were exploited. What are some negative effects you
can think of?

Negative effect of Colonization and Encomienda

Explanation:

Colonization and Economieda had many positive impacts in Europe because they generated wealth for the mother country. Colonies provided raw materials and got access to labour at a fair price with no restrictions. But, it also had a negative effect as it exploited the land and its resources for their benefits. Colonization destroyed the culture of the Native Americans which was followed for hundreds of years before the arrival of European in the New World. Diseases also played a crucial role in weakening the Natives. Encomienda introduced by the Spanish in America as a labour system. The purpose was to captured Native Americans and used them as labour in fields and mines. The exploitation of natives led many to die because of hardship and torture.

d. japan's attack on pearl harbor

the vast majority of ballots have been counted nearly two weeks after one of the biggest political upsets in modern u.s. history catapulted donald trump to the presidency.

estimates show more than 58 percent of eligible voters went to the polls during the 2016 election, nearly breaking even with the turnout rate set during the last presidential election in 2012, even as the final tallies in states like california continue to be calculated, according to statistics collected by the u.s. elections project.

but among those figures were stark contrasts in key states that swing the election to trump — in ohio, wisconsin, iowa, michigan and elsewhere — indicating the president-elect’s leap from long-shot candidate to the most powerful political position in the world may have happened in part because of apathy toward hillary clinton’s candidacy, especially among the democratic base, several political scientists and organizations monitoring voter turnout told the pbs newshour.

while clinton is leading the popular vote by more than 1.5 million over trump as of sunday, she trails president obama’s 2012 totals by more than 2 million ballots — a chasm that may have cost her the election, said david becker, co-founder of the center for election and innovation and research.

“several million voters didn’t come out to vote,” becker said. “which is telling me that this idea of the trump wave, a huge number of voters shifting over to trump, is certainly not the story.”