Lewis and Clark expedition How did expedition's charge to learn from Native Americans conflict with the U. S. policy toward Native Americans in general.

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

it would be a. that is the only one i could think of

a big main expressed powr of the congress is to

borrow money

congress borrows money all the time this is a rpime factor to pay for things that the americans need for example they give money ot the banks they give money to the milltary they borrow money so they can give it back to the people who need it such as the buisnessses and the army

we can argue that appeasement caused world war ii because it allowed hitler and the nazis to build germany’s military power until it was strong enough to fight a major war. additionally, appeasement emboldened germany, making it think the allies would never have the will to fight. this made germany much more aggressive and encouraged it to take the steps that eventually led to war.