The Industrial Revolution was a time of great change for Great Britain, and although many benefited from industrialization, children in cities frequently suffered. The large numbers of new factories and the many technical innovations ensured that children would be a necessary part of the new workforce. But the work was often hard and dangerous, and children were paid poorly and forced to work long hours. According to Darcy Koenig's book The Lives of Children During the Industrial Revolution, many child workers died or were so seriously injured in childhood that they were unable to work as adults. And even children who didn't work in factories suffered because they were often forced to beg on the streets to make up for the low pay their parents earned in factories. The Industrial Revolution was a particularly bad time for children.

Which sentence best evaluates the credibility of this historical argument?

A.
The historical argument is not credible because it does not make a claim about children during the Industrial Revolution.

B.
The historical argument is not credible because it does not support the claim with evidence from a credible source.

C.
The historical argument is credible because it makes the correct claim that children suffered during the Industrial Revolution.

D.
The historical argument is credible because it includes a strong claim and evidence from a credible source