4. In 2010, Randy Terrill, a state representative from Oklahoma, offered a bribe to a state senator to get her to leave her office. After an investigation, a judge decided that there was enough
evidence that Terrill had violated the law, and he was tried in court. In 2013, Terrill was convicted
of bribery and sentenced to one year in prison.
Explain which constitutional principle this scenario illustrates. What evidence led you to that
conclusion? (1 point)

i think its the outcome of people's preferences.

i confess that there are several parts of this constitution which i do not at present approve, but i am not sure i shall never approve them: for having lived long, i have experienced many instances of being obliged by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions even on important subjects, which i once thought right, but found to be otherwise. it is therefore that the older i grow, the more apt i am to doubt my own judgment, and to pay more respect to the judgment of others.

what does your friend need with?