How would a secondary source be beneficial to a historian studying a particular event?

a. it would eliminate the need for her to evaluate primary sources that have already been analyzed by other historians.
b. it would allow her to determine whether sources are reliable or unreliable without needing to actually read them.
c. it would eliminate the need for her to use any primary sources to support the historical argument she hopes to make.
d. it would her organize her primary sources without having to rely on techniques like historiography or chronological thinking.

CORRECT ANSWER~ (A)  It would eliminate the need for her to evaluate primary sources that have already been analyzed by other historians.

i do believe its (d) it allowed the government to offer pioneers sixty acres of western land if they lived on it and made improvements to it.

explanation: signed into law in may 1862, the homestead act opened up settlement in the western united states, allowing any american, including freed slaves, to put in a claim for up to 160 free acres of federal land. by the end of the civil war, 15,000 homestead claims had been established, and more followed in the postwar years

russia because it is the biggest state