Brainliest if right please help asap What do you think about suppressing certain evidence because it has been
obtained illegally? How does it relate to the Constitutional right to due process?
Explain your point of view fully, giving examples to back yourself up.

Admitting the evidence therefore makes the police “better off” than they would have been had they obeyed the Constitution, and suppressing the evidence ordinarily puts them in the same position that they would have occupied if they had refrained from performing the search or seizure.

Evidenced discovered by an illegal search and seizure is generally inadmissible in court under what is known as the "exclusionary rule." This means that even if the murder weapon was found and can conclusively establish that a suspect killed someone, if it was obtained through an illegal search and seizure.

Explanation:

How does it relate to the Constitutional right to due process?

it does not deny a defendant due process to subject initially to trial before ... as established in people, if the defense specifically requested certain evidence ... to the Court's overruling conflicting prior case law that had held constitutional ... does deny due process if he penalizes the assertion of a right or privilege

i think the answer is c, rivers.

explanation:

sometimes, borders fall along natural boundaries like rivers or mountain ranges. for example, the boundary between france and spain follows the crest of the pyrenees mountains. for part of its length, the boundary between the united states and mexico follows a river called the rio grande. the borders of four countries divide africa’s lake chad: niger, chad, cameroon, and nigeria.

freedom of speech is also protected by the 1 amendment.

explanation:

here is pretty much what the 1st amendment says:

congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.