History, 28.01.2021 01:20, nayshia

Which inference about Hitler’s interpreter does this excerpt support? He could not be trusted with Dorothea’s secret.
He was also Jewish and in hiding from the Germans.
He knew nothing about the practice of deporting Jews.
He was willing to risk his life to help Dorothea and her mother.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 17:50, loganharper992

At the start of the war, which countries were on the side of the central powers? check all that apply. ottoman empire great britain russia austria-hungary italy

Answers: 3

continue

History, 21.06.2019 18:30, LilCookies1

Which of the following was significant for the allied capture of rome? the capture of rome gave the allied powers direct access to the italian-german border and a road to reach berlin. the capture of rome led to the decline of the italian fascists, and those opposed to mussolini were able to regain control of their country. the allied capture of rome promoted an alliance with mussolini who had direct knowledge of hitler’s military strategy. capturing rome drew the german’s attention away from the soviet war front and toward the european theater.

Answers: 2

continue

History, 21.06.2019 22:00, madisonnxo

Which of the following is an example of the pull factor known as economic migration? a. better educational opportunities pulling people towards a new country b. mexican laborers entering the us to work in agricultural jobs c. joining family members that are already in a new country d. crop failures driving people away from their country i am unsure on this question, i was thinking b? but i could be wrong.

Answers: 2

continue

History, 22.06.2019 02:30, rickyop8010

Which statement in the passage best reflects sumer's opinion of the dred scott decision? a."i speak what cannot be denied." b."[the] judgment was sustained by a falsification of history." b."the opinion was more thoroughly abominable than anything history." i speak what cannot be denied when i declare that the opinion of the chief justice in the case of dred scott was more thoroughly abominable than anything of the kind in the history of courts. judicial baseness reached its lowest point on that occasion. you have not forgotten that terrible decision where a most unrighteous judgment was sustained by a falsification of history. -charles sumner, 1865

Answers: 3

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Which inference about Hitler’s interpreter does this excerpt support? He could not be trusted with...