The Tanakh explains the history of Judaism until the 500s BCE. It includes many details that are hard for historians to confirm. In one or two paragraphs, give your opinion on how seriously historians should treat religious texts as they try to understand past events and civilizations. Explain your opinion and support it with examples.

Can someone me write a paragraph on this topic i feel confused

Match these items. 1 . stephen douglas published "north star" 2 . frederick douglass first african slaves arrived in jamestown 3 . crittenden compromise proposed kansas-nebraska act 4 . republican party extend 36° 30' line to california 5 . abolitionists servitude in exchange for passage to the united states 6 . indentured struggle between proslavery and antislavery groups 7 . jefferson davis formed to prevent spread of slavery 8 . "bleeding kansas" wanted slavery abolished 9 . uncle tom's cabin president of confederacy 10 . 1619 harriet beecher stowe

How does the power of the supreme court act as a check on the other branches of government