Choose one of the two prompts below to write an argumentative short essay, including, introduction, one well developed reason and a conclusion.

You can use the documents with the summary of the Tinker V Des Moines, Hazelwood V Kuhlmeier or Morse V Frederick case as a reference and to PROPERLY cite evidence from the text.

Prompt1

Explain how the U. S. Constitution protects rights and explain how rights can be limited. Cite specific examples from the lesson activities to support your explanation.

Prompt 2
Explain the role of the judicial branch in protecting or limiting individual rights. Does the role of the judicial branch in protecting or limiting individual rights emphasize the need for an independent judiciary? Explain your answer.

The Constitution of the United States serves at least two purposes: First, it organizes the federal government. Second, the Constitution protects important freedoms.

Starting in New York in 1790, the early Supreme Court focused on establishing its rules and procedures and perhaps trying to carve its place as the new government’s third branch. However, given the difficulty of getting all the justices even to show up, and with no permanent home or building of its own for decades, finding its footing in the early days proved to be a monumental task. Even when the federal government moved to the nation’s capital in 1800, the Court had to share space with Congress in the Capital

i believe the answer is a

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!