By cutting off the funding of schools that had desegregated, Georgia's General Assembly showed that it would A. fight the Court's ruling in Brown.
B. carry out the Court's ruling in Brown,
C. end public education in Georgia.
D. ignore any ruling made by the Court.

A. fight the Court's ruling in Brown.

Explanation:

In the case of Brown Vs. the Board of Education, the supreme court decided that Separating white and black citizens in educational institution was considered as 'unconstitutional'. This decision was pivotal in ending racial segregation in United States.

But,  Georgia government respond to this by cutting out the funding for schools that desegregated (Even though they're only following the court's decision).  This action can be considered as an hostile respond to fight the Court's ruling in Brown vs Board of Education.

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.