Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts elucidated in Easley v. Cromartie might have led to a different holding than the holding in Shaw v. Reno.

answer:

the majority of cambodians living today were born after the khmer rouge was ousted in 1979 and some who survived can forget how bad it was. when khmer rouge forces seized phnom penh on april 17, 1975, the couple was living with eight of their children in a rural town called kampong chhnang.

explanation:

answer; /// slavery should be outlawed in the new country, was part of the initial draft of the declaration of independence, but not part of the final

(e) a major consequence of the election was that several southern states

it would be a. that is the only one i could think of