History
History, 19.01.2021 18:10, 20068513

explain how ONE specific historical event or development during the period 1786 to 1861 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Holt’s interpretation.

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 23:30, jeanetteelliotp9ru6m
“well,” he says, “there’s excuse for picks and letting-on, in a case like this; if it warn’t so, i wouldn’t approve of it, nor i wouldn’t stand by and see the rules broke—because right is right, and wrong is wrong, and a body ain’t got no business doing wrong when he ain’t ignorant and knows better. it might answer for you to dig jim out with a pick, without any letting-on, because you don’t know no better; but it wouldn’t for me, because i do know better.” the meaning in this excerpt is
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 07:00, mmm5398
What was the “u-2 incident” and how did it affect u. s./soviet relations in 1960?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 07:30, 727
Who was william mckinley? what platform did he run on?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 12:30, daniel6760
How did the creation of the federal deposit insurance corporation change the nature of banking in the united states
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
explain how ONE specific historical event or development during the period 1786 to 1861 that is not...

Questions in other subjects: