In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), why did the Supreme Court rule that Georgia did not have the authority to remove the Cherokees from their land? A. Only the federal government had the authority to deal with a sovereign nation.

B. Only federal law, not state law, applies to American Indian individuals.

C. It was illegal for Georgia to take this land from an individual.

D. Cherokee land was considered federal land and did not belong to Georgia.

I believe its D. Really sorry if I'm wrong.

Explanation:

D.) Cherokee land was considered federal land and did not belong to Georgia.

Georgia did not have the authority to take land from the Cherokee. This is because the land the Cherokee lived on didn't belong to Georgia, it belonged to the Federal Government.

Thus, only the Federal Government had the authority to take land from the Cherokee, not Georgia.

the exact role and status of women in the roman world, and indeed in most ancient societies, has often been obscured by the biases of both ancient male writers and 19-20th century ce male scholars, a situation only relatively recently redressed by modern scholarship which has sought to more objectively assess women's status, rights, duties, representation in the arts, and daily lives; and all this from almost exclusively male source material dealing with a male-dominated roman world.

women in mythology

unlike some other ancient cultures such as the greeks who had formed a creation myth where woman was a creature secondary to man and, more specifically, in the form of pandora, a bringer of unhappiness and vices, the romans had a more neutral approach where humanity, and not specifically the male, was created by the gods from earth and water. ovid's metamorphoses, for example, does not specify whether the first human was a man or a woman. at least in a physical sense then men and women were not regarded as belonging to a different species as in the greek world, a view often reiterated in roman medical treatises.