What is the big idea of this quote "Oliver Ellsworth. "We were partly national, partly federal. The proportional representation in the first branch was conformable to the national principle, and would secure the large States against the small. An equality of voices was conformable to the federal principle, and was necessary to secure the small States against the large."

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.

The big idea of this quote Oliver Ellsworth is the following.

Oliver was a delegate from Connecticut, and he was participating in the Federal Constitutional Convention to create the new Constitution of the United States.

Delegates were debating the difficult issue of representation of each state in Congress when he said "We were partly national, partly federal. The proportional representation in the first branch was conformable to the national principle and would secure the large States against the small. An equality of voices was conformable to the federal principle, and was necessary to secure the small States against the large."

He was referring to the issue of the number of representatives in the legislative branch for each state, considering that larger states could have a clear advantage over the small states. He tried to support the idea that the states would not have an equal vote in the House of Representatives. Oliver considered that small states had to be protected in some way by the larger states that had more people living in those states.

wealthy plebeians became part of the roman nobility. however, despite changes in the laws, the patricians always held a majority of the wealth and power in ancient rome. a third social class in roman society was the slaves. around one third of the people living in rome were slaves.

hope this

relations between the soviet union and the united states were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. the distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.

the united states government was initially hostile to the soviet leaders for taking russia out of world war i and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. although the united states embarked on a famine relief program in the soviet union in the early 1920s and american businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the new economic policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. by that time, the totalitarian nature of joseph stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the west. although world war ii brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating nazi germany, the soviet union's aggressive, antidemocratic policy toward eastern europe had created tensions even before the war ended.