Why did the British attempt to raise taxes in the colonies during the second half of the 1700s? A.)To pay for the French and Indian War.
B.)To fight the threat from Napoleon.
C.)To finance colonial social programs.
D.)To pay for Native American territory.

A.) To pay for the French and Indian War.

Explanation:

One of the main reasons that the colonists wanted to break away and become independent from Great Britain was because they kept trying to unfairly tax them.

Numerous tax laws were put on the colonists, taxing things like paper products or even taxing tea. The colonists thought this was very unfair, as they had nobody in the British Parliament to vouch for them. This is known as "taxation without representation."

Great Britain tried to say that the taxes were justified because they had to pay for the debt of the French and Indian War, which was very expensive and fought on American soil. They also said that since they were protecting the colonists with British troops, they should have the right to tax them.

Obviously, the colonists still disagreed and thought the taxing was unfair, which caused them to eventually boycott products that contained the tax and even in some cases become violent.

the answer is b: the religion they practice.

here's why:

there were many different native american tribes and those with similar characteristics formed a main tribe or nation. each had its own language, religion and customs.

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!