What is the difference between methodological and moral relativism?

Normative relativism is the prescriptive position that we should tolerate individuals or cultures with different moral standards. ... Methodological relativism is the practice of suppressing enculturated biases when studying other cultures (Obeyesekere 1966). Cultural relativism is a descriptive claim that ethical practices differ among cultures; that is, as a matter of fact, what is considered right in one culture may be considered wrong in another. ... Moral relativism is the claim that what is really right or wrong is what the culture says is right or wrong. Moral relativism holds that morals are not absolute but are shaped by social customs and beliefs. ... Moral objectivism maintains there's a single set of moral standards that should be adhered to. There are rights and wrongs which are universal. Morals are not defined simply by society or the individual. Explanation: Moral relativism is the view that moral judgments are true or false only relative to some particular standpoint (for instance, that of a culture or a historical period) and that no standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others. ... Relativistic views of morality first found expression in 5th century B.C.E.