Which of the following statements best explains the trend shown in the data? O State governments tend to be more responsive to social movemente ghan the federal government because they
are able to test out new programs on a smaller scale.
O The growth of social media has enabled movements to accelerate the acceptance of social change at the state
level, because these activities are not as successful at the federal level.
O A social movement needs to be approved by a percentage of the states before the federal government will
consider acting on the change because of fear of angering the conservative electorate.
The federal government refuses to use the federal courts to respond to social-reform movements.

A. State governments tend to be more responsive to social movements than the federal government because they are able to test out new programs on a smaller scale.

Explanation:

The given data shows many relevant features about state and federal authorities.

It is noticeable that state governments have reacted more actively to these socio-economic matters, than the federal authorities. Though they may have needed time to react and form plans, it is still more active.

Social media has evolved into the image at a much succeeding stage and is only appropriate to concerns after the mid-2000s, or so.

Besides, there are no such measures that a social movement requires to be first certified by a portion of the states.

Also, the federal government doesn't decline to practice the federal tribunals; it is just that the juridical means follows a hierarchy of tribunals.

question: write a report analyzing through articles of confederation.

answer: the articles of confederation the united states constitution was written when the people feared strong government the new nation needed some kind of organization to hold states together to them fend off future attacks and make a stronger support system through the states and people the states bonded through a friendship that best served as a defense against a invasion and states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations the strengths were that the congress has the highest power in the nation because of   fear of monarchy congress had the sole power to declare war and assign treaties disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress and weaknesses were the lack of power given to congress the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws if a state did not support a federal law that state could simply ignore it congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade.

explanation: so like every argument they have strengths and weaknesses but in this case there were more weaknesses but they managed o get through it and make an agreement

question answered by

(jacemorris04)

b is correct

have a cool day